Mahindra XUV 3XO vs Skoda Kylaq - Which One Should You Buy
Mahindra XUV 3XO vs Skoda Kylaq Comparison at CarHP India. Compare Mahindra XUV 3XO and Skoda Kylaq Prices, Mileage, Features, Specs, Colours and much more.
The Mahindra XUV 3XO comes in 41 variants. Engine options include Petrol, Diesel and CNG as per the selected variant, paired with manual, automatic, or auto transmissions. The selected variant is priced at ₹7.79 Lakh. The cheapest variant, MX1, costs ₹7.79 Lakh, while the top-end variant, AX7 L Turbo AT, is priced at ₹15.04 Lakh. The Skoda Kylaq comes in 13 variants. Engine options include Petrol as per the selected variant, paired with manual or automatic transmissions. The selected variant is priced at ₹7.59 Lakh. The cheapest variant, Classic, costs ₹7.59 Lakh, while the top-end variant, Prestige Plus AT, is priced at ₹12.99 Lakh.
₹ 7.79 Lakh

₹ 7.59 Lakh



Compare Minimum 2 Cars At Once — Tap To Activate / Deactivate
Smart Summary for Car Selection
Why choose
- The 1.2-litre direct-injection turbo makes 131hp and 230Nm against the Kylaq's 114bhp and 178Nm, so it is the stronger car by a clear margin on both counts
- A diesel is offered with claimed economy up to 21.2kmpl, and the Kylaq has no diesel at any price, so high-mileage buyers have one option here
- A panoramic sunroof and dual-zone climate control are both fitted, and the Kylaq offers neither
- The rear bench is wide enough for three adults, which the Kylaq's is not
- Six airbags, stability control and ISOFIX mounts are standard on every trim, and it holds a five-star Bharat NCAP rating for adults and children
- A six-speed torque converter automatic is offered on the petrol from low in the range
- It stands taller than the Kylaq, giving more headroom and easier entry
Why not choose
- The boot is smaller than the Kylaq's 446 litres and is among the smaller figures in its class
- Ventilated seats, paddle shifters and rear sunshades are all absent, which rivals at similar money now include
- Diesel buyers get an AMT rather than the torque converter, so the smoother automatic is petrol only
- No CNG is offered, so the cheapest running-cost route in this segment is unavailable
- The dual digital displays look dated next to newer rivals
Why choose
- The 446-litre boot is far larger than the XUV 3XO's, and in a sub-four-metre SUV that is the most useful single difference between them
- Peak torque of 178Nm arrives from 1,750rpm, so it pulls cleanly from low revs without needing a downshift
- A six-speed manual is offered alongside a torque converter automatic, and both pair with the same turbo engine, so power and gearbox choice are not traded against each other
- It rides on a longer wheelbase than the XUV 3XO, which shows in rear cabin length
- A 10.1-inch touchscreen and a fully digital driver's display are both fitted
- European chassis tuning gives it more composure at highway speed than most rivals at this size
Why not choose
- Only one engine is offered across the entire range, with no diesel, no CNG and no naturally aspirated alternative
- City economy in heavy traffic has been reported at around 10kmpl by multiple owners, which undoes a lot of the appeal
- It sits lower than the XUV 3XO, so headroom for taller rear passengers is tighter
- The 114bhp and 178Nm both trail the XUV 3XO's 131hp and 230Nm
- Camera quality is poor and the horn is light, both flagged consistently by multiple owners
- Seat ventilation blowers are noisy enough to be intrusive
XUV 3XO
The XUV 3XO is the stronger and better-equipped car, and for most buyers that decides it. Its 131hp and 230Nm comfortably beat the Kylaq's figures, the diesel gives it a running-cost option Skoda does not offer at all, and a panoramic sunroof with dual-zone climate control is unusual equipment at this size. The rear bench also seats three adults where the Kylaq's does not.
What it gives away is luggage space, and the gap is large: the Kylaq's 446-litre boot is among the biggest in the class while the XUV 3XO's is among the smallest. Diesel buyers should also note they get an AMT rather than the smoother torque converter.
Kylaq
The Kylaq's case rests almost entirely on its boot, and it is a strong case. At 446 litres it carries far more than the XUV 3XO, which for a family using a sub-four-metre car as its only vehicle matters more than most feature comparisons. Torque arriving from 1,750rpm and the choice of manual or automatic on the same engine are real advantages too.
What limits it is having one engine and nothing else. No diesel, no CNG and no alternative petrol means a buyer who wants lower running costs has nowhere to go, and multiple owners report around 10kmpl in heavy city traffic, which is poor enough to matter every month.
Engine and Performance
Performance Specifications
Fuel Specifications
Dimensions and Design
Interior Specifications
Wheels & Tires
Suspension, Brakes & Steering
Safety Features
Interior Features
Comfort & Convenience
Infotainment Features
Exterior Features
Brochure
EMI Cost Comparison
Assuming 20% down payment, 9.5% interest, 60-month tenure
Pros & Cons Comparison
Things We Like in Mahindra XUV 3XO
- Four powertrain options: TCMPFi petrol, TCMPFi petrol-CNG, TGDi petrol, and a turbo-diesel give buyers genuine flexibility.
- 1.5-litre diesel producing 300 Nm torque surpasses diesel SUVs from a segment above.
Things We Like in Skoda Kylaq
- Extremely refined engine and gearbox combination
- Skoda has added some helpful “Simply Clever” bits
Things We Don't Like in Mahindra XUV 3XO
- Polarising exterior design
- CNG variants are currently manual only
Things We Don't Like in Skoda Kylaq
- It's a 4‑seater car, not 5
- Top‑tier models have cheap plastics carried over from base variants
Mahindra XUV 3XO Comparisons
Skoda Kylaq Comparisons
SUV Comparisons
Car News
































