Maruti Suzuki FRONX vs Maruti Suzuki Dzire - Which One Should You Buy
Maruti Suzuki FRONX vs Maruti Suzuki Dzire Comparison at CarHP India. Compare Maruti Suzuki FRONX and Maruti Suzuki Dzire Prices, Mileage, Features, Specs, Colours and much more.
The Maruti Suzuki FRONX comes in 14 variants. Engine options include Petrol and CNG as per the selected variant, paired with manual or automatic transmissions. The selected variant is priced at ₹6.90 Lakh. The cheapest variant, Sigma, costs ₹6.90 Lakh, while the top-end variant, Alpha Turbo DT AT, is priced at ₹12.03 Lakh. The Maruti Suzuki Dzire comes in 13 variants. Engine options include Petrol and CNG as per the selected variant, paired with manual, automatic, or auto transmissions. The selected variant is priced at ₹6.31 Lakh. The cheapest variant, LXI, costs ₹6.31 Lakh, while the top-end variant, Maruti Dzire ZXI CNG AMT, is priced at ₹9.54 Lakh.
₹ 6.90 Lakh

₹ 6.31 Lakh



Compare Minimum 2 Cars At Once — Tap To Activate / Deactivate
Smart Summary for Car Selection
Why choose
- A 1.0-litre turbo making 100hp and 147.6Nm is offered with a six-speed torque converter automatic, and the Dzire has no turbo engine at any price
- Higher ground clearance means speed breakers and broken approaches stop being a calculation, which a low sedan can never claim
- A head-up display, a 360-degree camera and driver assistance features are all available, and the Dzire offers none of them
- The raised seating position gives a clearer view over traffic than the Dzire's sedan layout allows
- A full-size spare wheel is fitted
- CNG is offered on the lower versions for buyers who want the cheapest running cost
Why not choose
- The 308-litre boot is smaller than the Dzire's sedan boot, and a hatch opening handles large suitcases less easily than a sedan's deep well
- The naturally aspirated 1.2-litre engine is the same unit the Dzire uses, but it moves a heavier body here, so the entry Fronx is the slower of the two
- Rear knee room trails the Dzire, because sedan packaging puts length where the Fronx's coupe roofline takes it away
- CNG is manual only, so gas running costs and an automatic cannot be combined
- Rear drum brakes are fitted, so repeated hard braking with a full car fades sooner than a disc setup would
Why choose
- The sedan boot is considerably larger than the Fronx's 308 litres and its deep, square shape swallows suitcases the Fronx's sloping hatch fights
- CNG can be had with an automatic gearbox here, which the Fronx does not allow, making this the cheapest way to run either car without a clutch pedal
- The 1.2-litre three-cylinder petrol makes 80hp and 111.7Nm and claims up to 24.79kmpl, and in the lighter sedan body it returns closer to that figure than the Fronx does
- Rear knee room is better than the Fronx's, which matters when the back seat is occupied on long trips
- It costs less than the Fronx at comparable specification, because the sedan body carries no crossover premium
Why not choose
- No turbo engine is offered anywhere in the range, so 80hp is the ceiling and there is no route to more
- Low ground clearance means the underbody is exposed on unmade roads and tall speed breakers
- The head-up display, 360-degree camera and driver assistance features available on the Fronx are all missing
- The lower seating position offers less visibility in dense traffic
- The boot opening is narrow relative to the space behind it, so bulky items need angling in where the Fronx's hatch simply swallows them
Fronx
Buy the Fronx for one of two reasons: you want the turbo with an automatic, or you want the ground clearance. The 100hp turbo paired with a torque converter does real work on a highway and the Dzire has no equivalent, while the extra height under the car means an unmade approach road or a badly built speed breaker stops being something you plan around.
The head-up display and 360-degree camera come along with it. What you accept is a smaller, less usefully shaped boot and less rear knee room, both of which the sedan holds onto simply by being a sedan.
Dzire
The Dzire's case rests on two things the Fronx cannot match. Its sedan boot is bigger and better shaped for actual luggage, and CNG here can be paired with an automatic, which makes it the cheapest way to run either of these cars without working a clutch in traffic. The lighter body also means the shared 1.2-litre engine returns closer to its claimed 24.79kmpl than it does in the Fronx.
What the Dzire will never offer is more power, since 80hp is the range ceiling with no turbo above it, and its low body leaves the underside exposed on the kind of roads the Fronx shrugs off.
Engine and Performance
Performance Specifications
Fuel Specifications
Dimensions and Design
Interior Specifications
Wheels & Tires
Suspension, Brakes & Steering
Safety Features
Interior Features
Comfort & Convenience
Infotainment Features
Exterior Features
Brochure
EMI Cost Comparison
Assuming 20% down payment, 9.5% interest, 60-month tenure
Pros & Cons Comparison
Things We Like in Maruti Suzuki FRONX
- Offers both naturally aspirated and turbo-petrol engine options.
- Available with manual, AMT, and torque converter automatic transmissions.
Things We Like in Maruti Suzuki Dzire
- 5 Star GNCAP and BNCAP Safety rating.
- Highly fuel efficient with 24.79 km/l (petrol MT), 25.71 km/l (petrol AMT), and 33.73 km/kg (CNG) ARAI figures.
Things We Don't Like in Maruti Suzuki FRONX
- No diesel engine option available in the lineup.
- No factory-offered sunroof, which several rivals provide.
Things We Don't Like in Maruti Suzuki Dzire
- New 3-cylinder Z12 engine is not as refined or enthusiastic as the K12 it replaced.
- The 382-litre boot space is subpar in this segment.
Maruti Suzuki FRONX Comparisons
Maruti Suzuki Dzire Comparisons
SUV Comparisons
Car News






























